Meet SolarDNA. Pricing built on the data you already trust.
United States β€ΊMichigan β€ΊLitchfield β€Ί49252

Litchfield, MI 49252 solar market data

Updated June 30, 2009Older data Β· growth withheldProvisional score Β· under 500 installs By The SolarDNA Data Team
Litchfield 49252 has 1 solar installations at a median installed cost of $7.25/W, recent growth not yet measurable, and a Market Score of 32 β€” higher than 4% of U.S. zip markets.
Active installations
1
See data
Median cost
$7.25/W
See data
12-mo growth
β€”
See data
Market score
32
See data
Installers active
1
See data
32
Zip Market Score
Weak Β· higher than 4% of zips
Versus Michigan

How 49252 compares with the state

Installed cost
β€”
state median β€”/W
Market score
32 vs 37
Michigan scores 37
Share of state installs
1.52%
of 66 tracked statewide
Battery attach
0.0%
state 1.5%
Statewide momentum
β–² 2.6%
residential solar added in Michigan, 12 months through Jul 2026
Statewide market
29K systems
0.9% of homes Β· utility-reported through Jul 2026
Growth & pricing

49252 by year

No yearly series yet

Export CSV
Installations by year
Median installed cost, $/W DC by year
Installer comp set

Who installs in 49252

Ranked by systems recorded in this zip

Export CSV
#InstallerInstalls12-moAvg kW$/W
1ROBERT FOLLESE104$7.25
Neighboring zips

The nearest zip markets

By distance between zip centroids

ZipDistanceInstalls$/WScore
Frequently asked

Quick answers about 49252

How many solar installations are there in 49252?
SolarDNA counts 1 active solar installations in Litchfield 49252, 1 of them residential, with data through June 30, 2009.
How much does solar cost in 49252?
The median residential system in 49252 cost $7.25 per watt over the trailing twelve months.
Is solar growing in 49252?
Recent growth cannot be measured yet for 49252: insufficient recent data (data runs through June 30, 2009).
Who installs solar in 49252?
ROBERT FOLLESE lead the 1 installers with systems in 49252. The full comp set is above.
Is 49252 a good market for solar sales?
49252 scores 32 out of 100 (Weak, higher than 4% of U.S. zip markets). With under 500 installations the score is provisional.